Newsroom

50 years later, Obama salutes effects of Civil Rights Act

By PETER BAKER |

AUSTIN, Tex. — For three days, the veterans of a long-ago movement reunited and drew together their spiritual heirs to explore the legacy of the Civil Rights Act a half-century after it transformed America. And then the legacy walked onstage.

President Obama presented himself on Thursday as the living, walking, talking and governing embodiment of the landmark 1964 law that banned discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin.

In a speech that stirred an audience of civil rights champions here at the Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library and Museum, Mr. Obama acknowledged that racism has hardly been erased and that government programs have not always succeeded. But, he added, “I reject such cynicism because I have lived out the promise of L.B.J.’s efforts, because Michelle has lived out the legacy of those efforts, because my daughters have lived out the legacy of those efforts.”

Thanks to the law and the movement that spawned it and the progress made after it, Mr. Obama said, “new doors of opportunity and education swung open for everybody,” regardless of race, ethnicity, disability or sexual orientation. “They swung open for you, and they swung open for me,” he said. “And that’s why I’m standing here today, because of those efforts, because of that legacy.”

The president’s speech marking the 50th anniversary of the law Johnson signed in July 1964 was one more moment for Mr. Obama to address his own role in history. Though Mr. Obama often seemed reluctant to be drawn into discussions of race relations in his first term, insistent on being the president of everyone, he has been more open in talking about it since winning re-election.

The president made unusually personal comments after the case of Trayvon Martin, the Florida teenager whose death two years ago set off a roiling national debate about race, saying the slain young black man “could have been me.” He recently created an initiative called My Brother’s Keeper to help young men of color and has been more vocal about voting rights and equal pay for women. His administration has become more active in looking for ways to curb racial profiling by law enforcement and disparities in criminal sentencing. On Friday, he will address the Rev. Al Sharpton’s organization in New York.

“The second election and final election is behind him so he’s free,” Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, the civil rights icon who introduced Mr. Obama, said in an interview afterward. “There’s something about not having to run again that frees you. He’s liberated, and I do think he’s speaking out more.”

Still, Mr. Obama used most of Thursday’s address to extol Johnson in what could be the most generous speech by any sitting president about the Texan since his funeral, one that all but ignored the Vietnam War. Mr. Obama offered little of his own personal journey on race, which might not have connected to some in the room given that the president, the son of an absent father from Kenya and a white mother from Kansas, was a child growing up in Hawaii and Indonesia during the civil rights movement.

Nor did Mr. Obama use the speech to advance his policy priorities. He did not mention overhauling immigration, perhaps his biggest legislative goal, and did not say anything about same-sex marriage, which has been the most expansive social change during his presidency. He did not mention his fight against efforts to discourage voting, which the night before he called “un-American.” Nor did he cite equal pay for women, the theme of other speeches this week.

“He did a kind of inspiration and that’s important,” the Rev. Jesse Jackson, the longtime civil rights activist, said in an interview. “But beyond inspiration, we need the legislation, the budget and the policies to protect Johnson’s legacy.”

Mr. Obama was one of four presidents to address the conference. Jimmy Carter spoke on Tuesday and Bill Clinton on Wednesday.

Former President George W. Bush used a Thursday evening speech to call the achievement gap between white and black children “a national scandal” and urge both parties to address it as the central civil rights issue of the modern era.

As president, Mr. Bush signed the bipartisan No Child Left Behind education law, and he lamented on Thursday that “gains have stalled” and noted that a typical 17-year-old African-American student reads at the same level as a 13-year-old white student. Addressing critics of No Child Left Behind, he said he did not object to adjustments.

“But the problem comes when people start to give up on the goal,” he said. “Some have ideological objections to any federal role in education. Some are too comfortable with status quo. The alliance between ideology and complacency seems to be getting stronger. I fear that the soft bigotry of low expectations is returning.”

The event felt a little like a time capsule. Between speeches and panels, the audience listened to 1960s anthems by Bob Dylan and watched a grainy black-and-white video with scratchy audio of Johnson. A photo montage recalled the famous, and infamous, moments of the era, then traced the progress of race relations all the way to Mr. Obama’s presidency. The crowd stood for the gospel singer Mavis Staples, who performed “We Shall Overcome.”

On hand were Johnson’s two daughters, Luci Baines Johnson and Lynda Bird Johnson Robb; Maria Shriver, the niece of John F. Kennedy; and civil rights figures like Julian Bond and Andrew Young.

Mark K. Updegrove, the library director, showed the Obamas copies of the Emancipation Proclamation, the 13th Amendment ending slavery and signed by Abraham Lincoln, as well as the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts signed by Johnson.

Mr. Obama’s encomium to Johnson at times sounded like a rebuttal of critics, mainly on the left, who have compared him unfavorably with the signer of so many major pieces of legislation. “He was charming when he needed to be, ruthless when required,” Mr. Obama said. “He could wear you down with logic and argument, he could horse trade and he could flatter.”

All traits that critics and some supporters say Mr. Obama does not seem to have. But unlike Johnson’s powerful Democratic majorities, Mr. Obama has a Republican House, and he argued that progress continued to be made “however many times we have to take a quarter of a loaf or a half a loaf.”

In a ruminative moment, he said: “You’re reminded daily that in this great democracy, you are but a relay swimmer in the currents of history, bound by decisions made by those who came before, reliant on the efforts of those who will follow to fully vindicate your vision. But the presidency also affords a unique opportunity to bend those currents by shaping our laws and by shaping our debates, by working within the confines of the world as it is but also by reimagining the world as it should be.”

Posted in: News Articles • Tagged with:

Civil rights remain a struggle in Texas

By Members of the Texas Senate Democratic Caucus

This week, Texas will welcome four U.S. Presidents and dozens of dignitaries for the Civil Rights Summit at the LBJ Presidential Library. It’s a chance to honor an essential movement that’s reshaped, and is continuing to reshape, our great nation.

It’s also a chance to reflect on what “civil rights” — ideas like freedom, fairness, equality, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness — mean to 21st century Texans. There are still unfair laws to fight. But in Texas, the civil rights struggle has expanded to unfair budgets as well.

Make no mistake: Education is a civil right. Healthcare is a civil right. So are the rights to drink clean water, move freely about our communities and, most importantly, vote.

For years, these rights have been undermined, and even openly attacked, in the Texas Capitol. There may not be the same grainy, violent news footage that people associate with the civil rights struggle, but the basic stakes of fairness and equality haven’t changed.

Texans love this state. We settle and stay here to pursue our fair share of Texas’ prosperity. So we rightly demand a fair system that provides real, meaningful freedom and opportunity to each of us — no matter our ethnicity, our gender or where we live.

But when we look to those running state government, Texans don’t always see fairness.

Instead, we see a fixed system that consistently puts well-connected millionaire donors and corporations ahead of middle-class working Texans.

We see a school finance system that’s so unfair and inadequate that most Texas school districts felt compelled to sue the state over it.

We see a sustained attack on health services, women and the poor, along with efforts to revise history, whitewash the record, and ignore the plain fact that Texas leads the nation in its percentage of uninsured residents.

We see a murky, incomprehensible budget that makes it difficult to determine how much of our money is going to school kids and how much is going to billionaire sports team owners.

We see budget writers who piously scold others about “budgeting like a family” while they watch state highways grind to a halt, allow rural areas to fall into drought, and ignore the obvious investments that would keep the state’s infrastructure from crumbling like a neglected house.

And in clear echoes of struggles from 50 years ago, we see repeated efforts to make it harder for Texans to exercise the most fundamental right of all – the right to cast their ballots.

These are subtle attacks. They generally occur in back rooms and behind closed doors. They don’t make for iconic television.

But for children, women and men of all races – for hard-working citizens across Texas – these are attacks on dignity, opportunity for prosperity, freedom, and, yes, civil rights.

For these millions and millions of Texans, the fight for freedom and fairness is as much about the present and future as it is about the past.

We’re glad so many people have come to Texas this week to take part in this critical conversation. Let’s make sure it extends beyond this event, through this year’s elections and into next year’s legislative session.

This article was co-authored by members of the Texas Senate Democratic Caucus, including Senators Kirk Watson (Chair), John Whitmire, Judith Zaffirini, Rodney Ellis, Eddie Lucio, Jr., Royce West, Leticia Van de Putte, Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa, Carlos Uresti, José Rodríguez, and Sylvia R. Garcia.

Posted in: Op-Eds • Tagged with:

Predatory lending hurts Texas families

By Senator Rodney Ellis, Representative Mike Villarreal, Representative Craig Eiland

In an op-ed published in the Galveston Daily News, Adam Burklund, field organizer for the Consumer Service Alliance of Texas, asserted that we and the “consumer interest groups” we represent defeated the predatory lending reform bill last session. While we would like to revel in any claim that gives us so much power over the Texas legislature, we hate to break it to Mr. Burklund, but the only consumer interest groups we represent are the consumers of our respective House and Senate districts.

To refresh Mr. Burklund’s memory, the bill that he says passed “overwhelmingly” out of the Senate Business and Commerce Committee actually passed 5-3, hardly what we would call a landslide. Furthermore, the compromise bill that Mr. Burklund claims Senator Ellis had a hand in killing on the Senate floor last session actually passed off the Senate floor with  the support of 24 senators − a truly bipartisan piece of legislation. Maybe Mr. Burklund is referring to the death of the version of the bill that came out of the Senate committee that contained a little provision that the predatory lending industry was really banking on: the so-called preemption clause.

The preemption clause would have voided any steps that cities had taken or will take in the future to protect their residents against the most harmful practices of the predatory lending industry. At the time that the bill was being debated in the Senate, seven Texas cities had passed similar ordinances to protect their residents, all stronger than what was being proposed in the bill that passed out of the Senate committee. Had that version of the bill passed, those ordinances would have been voided and replaced by substantially weaker statewide legislation. Fortunately, the Senate saw the danger of the preemption clause and unanimously, and overwhelmingly, voted to nullify it.

Since then, eight more Texas cities have passed similar ordinances, including the City of Houston. As of today, 6.7 million Texans are protected by an ordinance that is stronger than what passed out of the Senate committee, and this scares the predatory lending industry to death. This is why the industry showed up in droves and testified for hours against the bill when it was heard in the House committee.  It was at this point that the bill never saw the light of day again.

Our actions have never been devious, as Mr. Burklund asserts in his op-ed. We have been very up front and honest with our efforts to push for strong legislation that offers real protections for Texas consumers and oppose any legislation that would actually hinder Texas cities from passing ordinances that are right for their residents.

Mr. Burklund claims that we want to kill the predatory lending industry as it exists in Texas. This is also untrue. We want to change how the predatory lending industry conducts business as usual and see the most egregious of its practices die. In 2012, the current predatory lending business model drained $1.25 billion in fees from working Texas families for loans at 500 percent interest and higher. Business as usual hurts Texas families.

The fact of the matter is, while 15 states and D.C. currently either prohibit predatory lending or have regulations restrictive enough that the industry chooses not to operate in those states, there are nine states that have sensible limitations on fee rates, loan usage, and terms, and the predatory lending industry still manages to exist.

We have always maintained that we do not want the small loan business to go out of business in Texas. We understand there is a need for it in our communities. What we want is for the businesses providing the loans to operate in a responsible, fair, and honest way. The people of Texas would be better served if the industry supported fair lending practices rather than fighting efforts to better the way they conduct their predatory business by penning misleading op-eds and attempting to change easily verifiable facts.

Posted in: Op-Eds • Tagged with:

Roads need room for cyclists and pedestrians

By Rodney Ellis and Michael Payne

The Houston Chronicle’s recent articles on cycling fatalities highlight the heartbreaking fact that immediate work is needed to enable safe road access for all users. Houston has the unfortunate distinction of being among the cities with the highest cyclist and pedestrian fatality rates in the country.

As avid cyclists, we have certainly had our fair number of close calls, whether from drivers failing to yield to being forced to ride in dangerous streets without sidewalks or bicycle lanes to provide a safe passing distance. We’ve also had friends and colleagues killed and injured. So make no mistake: This is extremely personal to us. As we mourn the loss of these lives, we must work harder on engineering, policy and education at both the state and local level to prevent future tragedies.

We applaud the Houston Police Department and Harris County district attorney for their ongoing efforts in the Chelsea Norman hit-and-run fatality, as well as Mayor Annise Parker and the Houston City Council for passing a Complete Streets Plan and the Safe Passing Ordinance. But more must be done, and it is time to get serious about planning and building legitimate bicycle lanes.

The city of Houston urgently needs to update its Master Bicycle Plan, last done in 1996. This will establish the best and worst streets for cycling and give the Public Works Department a clear set of priorities for improved bike lane development. Channeling cyclists onto the safe routes will improve the experience for all road users. Many cities are learning and changing, and we, too, must address this problem more proactively.

Recent successes include the bond referendum supporting the Bayou Greenways initiative and the passage of House Bill 200 in the last legislative session, which supports the development of paths in utility corridors. These changes will help transform Houston through a system of trails and green space. However, without a well-thought-out network of bike lanes to move people into and away from these linear parks, we will be faced with more riders on streets designed only for automobiles. A master bicycle plan and proper bike lanes will be critical to providing a safe way for people in all neighborhoods to get to and from these paths and use their bicycles for transportation as well as recreation. While a white stripe on the road will not stop an impaired motorist, there is no question that meeting national standards for width or physical separations will decrease the probability of a car colliding with a cyclist.

In addition to a safe infrastructure, more public education on road safety and enforcement of traffic laws will help make certain that all road users are safe. Drivers can save lives by paying attention to the road and refraining from texting. They should also always give cyclists a wide pass, obey the speed limits and be vigilant at intersections.

Cyclists have a duty, too. They can help by making sure they are visible, planning their routes carefully and complying with all traffic laws. It is also important for families to model safe behaviors for their children when bicycling, such as wearing helmets and obeying traffic signs.

Livable communities are important to the improvement of Texans’ safety and health. We must begin planning and developing an inclusive infrastructure that accommodates motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. Adding sidewalks and lanes for bicycles not only makes our roads safer, but also adds economic value to communities and improves the quality of life for residents. Street improvements encourage walking and cycling for health, mitigate traffic congestion for short trips, and help improve air quality.

At the state level, bipartisan legislation has been introduced in multiple legislative sessions to improve street design and operation and establish a safe passing distance around unprotected road users. Unfortunately, these bills have yet to become law. Although some Texas cities and communities have begun to embrace multimodal street transportation, the state should do more to lead efforts and guarantee that each community is uniquely suited to handle its respective mobility needs.

Over time, these engineering initiatives, policy changes and education efforts will reduce fatalities and injuries. Let’s all do our part individually as we work to ensure that all users can safely enjoy the road.

Ellis, a Democrat, represents Houston in the Texas Senate. Payne is executive director of BikeHouston.

Posted in: Op-Eds • Tagged with:

Time to protect consumers from predatory loans

By REP. MIKE VILLARREAL, REP. CRAIG EILAND and SEN. RODNEY ELLIS

We would like to congratulate the City of Houston for passing an ordinance to protect its residents from predatory payday and auto title loans, and we urge other cities in the Houston-Galveston area to do the same.

Last year United Way of Greater Houston and Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston successfully joined with faith community leaders and non-profit assistance programs to urge the City of Houston to pass the local ordinance. These organizations are partnering again this Thursday as Catholic Charities in Houston, 2900 Louisiana St., hosts a 3 p.m. forum where Texas Faith for Fair Lending will hear from clients who have been directly impacted by payday and auto title lending.

Why should other cities in the area pass this ordinance?

Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin, and El Paso have all passed local ordinances to regulate payday and auto title loans. But now lenders in big cities are sending customers from the regulated cities to their stores in neighboring communities, so it is crucial that those municipalities pass ordinances to protect consumers as well. In the Houston area, South Houston already has done so, and Missouri City has taken action as well.

The stories of payday and auto title loan borrowers – like those that will be heard on Thursday at the Texas Faith for Fair Lending forum – well illustrate the need for immediate action by municipal officials.

In San Antonio, for example, a nonprofit organization described one of their many clients who found himself in trouble with a payday loan. A gentleman in his seventies, living only on his Social Security check, took out a payday loan to cover an unexpected medical bill.

As often happens, he couldn’t pay off the loan and cover his other monthly expenses. Before long he had taken out multiple loans and was skipping meals so he could make loan payments!

Of course we wish he had made a better decision about taking out the loan in the first place. We wish he had negotiated a payment plan for his medical bill, borrowed money from a family member, or chosen one of the other options people turn to in states that don’t have payday lenders.

Yes, we need to do a better job of educating Texans about personal finances. But just as we learned during the nation’s subprime mortgage crisis in 2008, we also need basic regulations that help borrowers avoid loans they can’t afford.

The loans, which often have interest rates over 600%, are marketed as emergency two-week or one-month loans backed by the borrower’s next paycheck or car title. But the truth is that the business model actually relies on giving customers loans they cannot pay back on time.

In fact, a recent study by the new U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found that nearly half of all payday loan customers have more than 10 refinances or new loans each year. Each time the customer refinances the loan or takes out a new one to pay off the debt, he or she pays a new round of high fees. In Texas, those fees are typically around $22 per $100 borrowed.

The excessive fees charged by payday and auto title lenders drain millions of dollars from the local economy and exacerbate the burden on already over-stretched charitable and social service providers. What’s more, dozens of our friends and neighbors have their cars repossessed by auto title lenders, making it difficult for them to even get to work, much less get ahead.

During the last legislative session, industry lobbyists blocked the reform bill we tried to pass. While the legislature is clearly at a stalemate on this issue, Texas cities are not.

The common sense ordinance we recommend limits payments to 20 percent of the borrower’s monthly income, allows no more than three renewals, and establishes other protections to ensure customers aren’t caught in a cycle of debt.

To protect more consumers, we encourage all cities in the Houston-Galveston area and throughout the state of Texas to pass a payday and auto title lending reform ordinance.

Posted in: Op-Eds • Tagged with:

It’s time to raise the minimum wage

By Sen. Rodney Ellis and Rep. Senfronia Thompson – Special to the American-Statesman

Last month, the nation celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s life, achievements and his dream for America.

While most Americans recognize Dr. King as a civil rights leader striving for equality of opportunity, he was also an advocate for the dispossessed, the downtrodden and the forgotten. He championed the plight of the poor, organizing the “Poor People’s Campaign,” pushed Congress for a poor people’s bill of rights, and ultimately sacrificed his life standing up for fair wages with Memphis sanitation workers.

In the nearly 46 years since Dr. King’s death, America and Texas have made great strides in some areas, but only small, halting steps in others. Even in good times, Texas has done a very poor job of providing for the poorest among us. Our rich are getting richer while our poor are falling further behind, too often struggling to put food on the table.

Today, even more so than during Dr. King’s life, the dividing line in Texas is just as much about green as it is black, white, or brown. All too often, it’s not the content of one’s character that matters — it’s the contents of one’s wallet.

More than 4.6 million Texans live in poverty each day, including one out of four children. Texans are laboring harder, but hourly wages, when adjusted for inflation, are falling. At the current minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, a parent with a full-time job still does not earn enough to be above the federal poverty line. It’s certainly not a living wage, regardless of Texas’ relative low cost of living.

We’re not talking about an insignificant number of people, either. With 452,000 Texans paid at or below the minimum wage in 2012, far too many can’t make ends meet despite full-time employment. Those nearly half a million Texans give our state the unfortunate distinction of ranking second in the nation in the percentage of hourly workers who earn at or below minimum wage.

If we are serious about honoring King’s legacy, it’s time we did something about it. A bill pending in Congress would do just that by increasing the minimum wage to $10.10 by 2016 and indexing it to inflation to ensure it preserves its value. After all, the minimum wage has failed to maintain its buying power — the minimum wage of $1.60 an hour in 1968 would be $10.71 today when adjusted for inflation.

Using recent history as a guide, we know the chances are slim that D.C. gridlock will evaporate enough to get this bill passed. Fortunately, Texas can act on its own, just as we pushed it to do seven years ago. When we filed legislation to increase the state’s minimum wage in 2007, we knew it was an uphill climb — and we acknowledge that it still is today, despite poll after poll showing Democrats and Republicans alike support increasing the minimum wage. But an uphill climb alone can never be a reason to not pursue something that will improve the daily life of millions of Texans.

In a recent study analyzing the impact of the proposed increase to $10.10, the Economic Policy Institute found that almost 2 million Texas workers would see their wage increased.

It’s not just teens who would benefit, either. Adults older than 20 make up 88 percent of workers nationwide who would receive a raise if the federal minimum wage were increased to $10.10. More than half work full-time and a full third are older than 40.

Concerns about resulting job losses have largely proved to be illusory, as rigorous research has shown time and time again that that minimum wage increases do not reduce employment.

The bottom line is that the vast majority of Americans have not reached the mountaintop, and it is the job of public policymakers to ensure everyone has access to the tools necessary to make the climb.

Raising the minimum wage rewards the strong work ethic that built Texas, allowing someone who works hard at a full-time job to support a family and the opportunity to access a bridge out of poverty.

Instead of merely celebrating the life of Dr. King with rhetoric, let’s stand together and honor what he stood for by taking meaningful action towards the realization of his dream. It’s time to raise Texas’ minimum wage.

State Senator Rodney Ellis and State Representative Senfronia Thompson are both from Houston.

Posted in: Op-Eds • Tagged with:

Senators Ellis, Garcia, and Whitmire ask Harris County Clerk for voter notification

For Immediate Release

February 11, 2014

(Houston, TX) — In a February 10 letter (click here to view), Senator Rodney Ellis (D-Houston) joined with Senators Sylvia Garcia (D-Houston) and John Whitmire (D-Houston) in asking Harris County Clerk Stan Stanart to mail notices to voters for whom the records reveal a name discrepancy and allow them to correct the record before the March primary.

Texas’ voter ID law requires that a voter’s name on their photo identification exactly match the name on their voter registration.  If it is not an exact match, voters are required to sign an affidavit provided the names are “substantially similar” in the eyes of the election judge.  If the names are not “substantially similar,” the voter will be forced to cast a provisional ballot that will not count unless the voter follows up within six days with supporting information.  Although the voter ID requirements will affect all voters, women may be disproportionately impacted because some may have opted for multiple names changes according to marital status.

Voters can avoid this confusion by remedying any discrepancies on the voting rolls in advance of an election.  By sending out notifications to impacted voters, the Harris County Clerk can proactively address any discrepancies before the upcoming election so voters can exercise their constitutional right to vote without undue obstruction.

The Houston senators released the following statements:

“I hope that Mr. Stanart understands that protecting the constitutional right to vote is essential to our democratic elections and takes all the steps he can to ensure that our constituents who are eligible to vote are able to do so,” said Senator Ellis.

“The right to vote should never be taken lightly. We need to work toward improving access to the ballot box and protecting the right to vote. Turning people away due to an unintentional  name discrepancy or misinterpretation of the law, goes against basic democratic principles we all cherish. I urge Mr. Stanart to do everything possible to ensure everyone’s constitutional right is protected,” said Senator Garcia.

“We should be working together to increase voter turnout in our elections. I urge Mr. Stanart to use all necessary means to assist the voters in Harris County in correcting any discrepancies in their voter registration,” said Senator Whitmire.

###

Posted in: Press Releases • Tagged with:

Keeping Dr. King’s Dream Alive

On January 20, we celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s life, achievements, and his dream for our nation.

While most Americans recognize Dr. King as a civil rights leader striving for equality of opportunity, he was also a champion for the dispossessed, the downtrodden, and forgotten.  He fought for the rights of the poor, questioning how a country with so much wealth and prosperity could tolerate and excuse the continued suffering of so many in our nation.  He was dedicated to the goal of eradicating poverty, ensuring economic justice, and achieving access to quality educational opportunities for all our children.  He championed the plight of the poor, organizing the “Poor People’s Campaign,” pushed Congress for a poor people’s bill of rights, and ultimately sacrificed his life standing up for fair wages with Memphis sanitation workers.

Indeed, his dream was to ensure that every American, regardless of race, color, creed or economic circumstance, had real access to the American Dream.

In the nearly 44 years since Dr. King’s death, America and Texas have made great strides in some areas, but only small, halting steps in others.  Even in good times, Texas has done a very poor job of providing for the poorest among us.  We have the highest percentage of uninsured in the country and one of the highest poverty rates.

This is the reality that is not discussed enough today, but Dr. King would be out in front, telling truth to power.  We have become obsessed with the performance of the stock market and 401Ks, but those investments do not reflect the reality of millions of Texans and millions more Americans who see no benefit from a healthy quarterly bottom line.  To echo Robert Kennedy, the Dow Jones doesn’t measure the strength of our families, the health of our citizens, or the quality of our public debate.  Nor does not measure the widening gap between those with and those striving to keep up.

Last month, President Obama gave a stirring speech on the lack of economic mobility and its impact on accessing the American Dream. He said that “a dangerous and growing inequality and lack of upward mobility … has jeopardized middle-class America’s basic bargain – that if you work hard, you have a chance to get ahead.” The President called it “the defining challenge of our time: making sure our economy works for every working American.”

We certainly see the impacts in Texas, which ranks among the highest in the country in income inequality. Nationwide, income inequality has been on the rise for decades and is now its highest since 1928, and the impacts of the recent recession have only magnified these inequities. For example, 95 percent of the income gains from 2009-12 were captured by the wealthiest one percent. The top one perfect saw their incomes climb 31.4 percent, while the bottom 99 percent saw growth of only 0.4 percent.

Today, even more so than during Dr. King’s life, the dividing line in America is just as much about green as it is black, white, or brown. All too often, it’s not the content of one’s character – it’s the contents of one’s wallet.

This is obviously not meant to in any way diminish the unbelievable courage Dr. King and all those who led the civil rights cause displayed, or lessen the struggles and tribulations they endured while fighting for that dream. They risked their lives for the ideal that all men are created equal and changed America – and the world – for the better.

But that does not mean the work is done.

The vast majority of Americans have not reached the mountain top, and it is the job of public policymakers to ensure everyone has access to the tools necessary to make the climb.

This means investing in our children’s schools so that Texas no longer must face the specter of an unconstitutional school finance system. This means expanding Medicaid so that our federal tax dollars can be spent here at home on the hundreds of thousands of uninsured Texans that fear the next sickness or spill will result in bankruptcy. And this means raising the minimum wage so that all Texans get an honest day’s pay for an honest day’s work.

Instead of merely celebrating the life of Dr. King with rhetoric, let’s stand together and honor what he stood for by taking meaningful action towards the realization of his dream. Today, let us rededicate ourselves to his call to action to shed light on inequality and demand justice for all. Dr. King’s dream is alive and well in our community today, and I am grateful to all who fight alongside me to ensure it is realized.

Posted in: Op-Eds • Tagged with:

Sen. Ellis calls for TDI to oppose homeowners insurance rate increases

(Austin, TX) // Senator Rodney Ellis (D-Houston) sent a letter (click here for PDF or see below) to Insurance Commissioner Julia Rathgeber calling on her to oppose the recent homeowners insurance rate increases announced by the three largest insurers in the state. Continue Reading »

Posted in: Press Releases • Tagged with:

Senator Ellis and Senate Colleagues call for Chair of Finance Commission to Resign

For Immediate Release
January 7, 2014

Senator Ellis and Senate Colleagues call for Chair of Finance Commission to Resign

(Austin, TX) // Senator Rodney Ellis (D-Houston) today joined with Senators Sylvia Garcia (D-Houston) and John Whitmire (D-Houston) in asking William White to voluntarily resign his post as Chairman of the Finance Commission of Texas. The letter comes after the El Paso Times published comments made by Mr. White disparaging the consumers of payday loans. Mr. White is also the Vice President of Cash America, a payday loan company.

“The purpose of the Finance Commission is clearly written in statute. The Commission must protect the interests of Texas consumers, maintain sound banking systems, and increase the economic prosperity of the state. Mr. White’s recent public comments betray this mission and severely call into question his ability to put his outside employment aside and truly look out for Texas consumers,” said Senator Ellis.

——————

Letter to Chairman White:

January 7, 2014

Mr. William White, Chairman
Finance Commission of Texas
2601 N. Lamar Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78705

Dear Chairman White,

We are writing to ask that you voluntarily resign your post as Chairman of the Finance Commission of Texas as soon as practicable. Your recent comments published in the El Paso Times on December 29, 2013 contradict your duties as the presiding officer and member of the Finance Commission and have eroded our confidence that you can perform the responsibilities assigned to you by statute with fairness and without prejudice.

By law, the Finance Commission “shall carry out its functions in a manner that protects consumer interests, maintains a safe and sound banking system, and increases the economic prosperity of the state.” The Finance Commission is also responsible for the oversight of the Office of Consumer Credit, which regulates the consumer credit industry and educates consumers and creditors with the goal of “producing a fair, lawful, and healthy credit environment for social and economic prosperity in Texas.”

Your recent comments betray both the mission and the responsibility of the Finance Commission and the Office of Consumer Credit to protect consumer interests and to foster economic prosperity. In the interview with the El Paso Times, you are quoted as questioning the motivation of payday loan borrowers and suggest that borrowers may be using the loans for less than necessary items. As the presiding officer of the Finance Commission you should be well aware that most consumers of payday or auto title loans use them to pay for unexpected emergencies or for ordinary expenses because they simply do not make enough to make ends meet.

In 2012 alone, 35,000 Texas families lost their cars to auto title businesses, payday and auto title businesses drained $1.25 billion in fees from working families, and 32 percent of non-profit clients requesting charitable assistance were in trouble with payday or auto title loans according to Texas Appleseed. Additionally, women, minorities, and low-income consumers are disproportionately impacted by the negative economic effect of payday loans, often hindering the financial prosperity of these populations and increasing economic inequality. By looking at these shocking numbers, it appears the payday loan industry prospered at the expense of Texas families and communities. By virtue of your current position as Chairman of the Finance Commission, you cannot turn a blind eye to these facts, regardless of your outside employment as vice president of a payday lender.

Furthermore, the resolution passed by the Finance Commission on April 20, 2012 that bears your signature is deeply concerning. It can be argued that this resolution is an attempt by the Commission to influence legislation, which as you should be fully aware, is illegal. The payday industry has fought tooth and nail to defeat the passage of local ordinances, and we are happy the industry’s efforts failed in 11 Texas cities, including, most recently, our hometown of Houston. To pass a resolution that discourages local control gives the appearance that you seek to pursue the interests of the payday loan industry and not Texas consumers. We intend to look further into whether the resolution is indeed an improper and illegal use of state resources.

By requiring by statute that one member of the Finance Commission be a consumer credit executive, the legislature hoped the requirement would bring knowledge and expertise of the industry to regulation enforcement and that any conflicts of interest would and must be avoided. In confirming your appointment as Chairman, as with all our Senate colleagues, we trusted you to perform the duties assigned to the post judiciously with the goal of protecting Texas consumers. Turning the focus and blame towards the consumer as you did in your interview severely calls into question your ability to do so.

Texans deserve a Finance Commission that is looking out for them and their interests. As you have lost our confidence and the public’s confidence to carry out the duties of your office competently, fairly, and without prejudice, we are asking you to resign your position as Chairman of the Finance Commission.

Sincerely,
Rodney Ellis    Sylvia Garcia    John Whitmire

PDF: Letter to Chairman White calling for his resignation

Posted in: Press Releases • Tagged with: